Regency Reader Questions: Bluestockings

Thanks for your question, Grace, and for being a Regency Reader!

In the 1750s, Elizabeth Montagu and Elizabeth Vesey formed The Blue Stockings Society, an informal literary discussion group that invited both men and women to discuss items of interest.  These women were privileged, and therefore had the education and leisure to further their interests.  Yet when Society expected these women to focus on accomplishments, like needlework and instruments, their devotion to education was often ridiculed or distrusted.

The origin of the name bluestocking is still disputed, but it likely refers to the less formal, daywear blue worsted stockings either worn by Benjamin Stillingfleet to the events or by the members altogether.  As both sexes were involved in the Society, the term bluestocking could refer to both men and women.

This would change by the Regency era, cementing its derogative implications.  By 1830, its definition would be  “BLUE – STOCKING ; a pedantic female ; one who sacrifices the characteristic excellencies of her sex to learning” (The Popular Encyclopedia: Being a General Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature, Biography, History, and Political Economy. Reprinted from the American Ed. of the “Conversations Lexicon,” with Corrections and Additions …. (1830). United Kingdom: Blackie.)

There is evidence in the record that the term could be used both fondly and meanly, however, depending on the opinions and intent of the speaker or author.  However, by in large, it was considered peculiar for a female to be so interested in academics that she eschewed the other accomplishments, so bluestocking was even in the fondest sense a mark of oddity.

Things would change by the Victorian era, judging by the record:

would go near to occupying our entire article May we not add in our own country the names of Miss Hannah Adams Mrs Haile of New Hampshire and last though by no means least that of the fair authoress of Redwood and Hope Leslie Not withstanding the truth of our foregoing remark we occasionally hear gentlemen finely dressed and very competent to dancing and all mat ters connected with the discipline of the heels endeavoring to enliven their vapid conversation with attempts at poor wit upon bluestocking ism With them this is a term of reproach affixed to any thing like intelligence among ladies To us observations of this character al ways seem clear evidence of envious feeling and as a conscious ac knowledgement of the poor garnishing of the inner man as far as themselves are concerned They wisely draw a fair comparison with bluestocking ladies who might be able to note their woful lack of matter in the upper story In most societies these poor attempts of witlings upon this subject are received as they should be The grand cause of the admission of the equality of the ladies in point of intellect with the gentlemen is steadily advancing in our country As a proof The Western Monthly Review. (1828). United States: E.H. Flint.

This came with the gains women made in the Western world over the next century, to have access to education, the right to vote, the right to own a bank account, etc.

Hope this helps, Grace!

Ask us more questions about the Regency in our Regency ? page. We are also trialing a new service, Research Requests, for writers or others wanting a more in-depth answer with sources, or looking for a Beta read with an eye to historical details.

Appreciate our research?  Please share with other readers, leave your comments, buy a book through one of our links on reviews, or buy us a cup of tea!

Tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.