Regency Villains: Lord Huntingtower

Okay, so maybe it’s a little hyberbolic to call someone’s ancestor from 200 years ago a villain. But the man definitely did villainous acts. Like ripped out of the pages of historical romance where readers would raise skeptical eyebrows. Maybe its rose-colored glasses, sentimentality, or our tendency to almost infantilize people in the past? But I digress.  Because I want to serve this piping hot 200 year old tea.

I suppose that makes it ice cold. Anyway, whether old gossip or new inspiration, I think Lord Huntingtower was a fascinating character.

I stumbled upon Lord Huntingtower looking for something completely different, and then I had to keep digging because this story was wild.  Follow my rabbit trail:

My interest was piqued, so then I searched some more and found this:

The case of Trimmer v Lord Huntingtower Earl Dysart tried at Leicester many years ago was of a very singular character The action was brought by Mr Trimmer a clergy man living in the immediate neighbourhood of where he had a large establishment for the education of young gentlemen The from some matter of feeling against the plaintiff devoted a space of ground opроsite
site that gentleman's establishment to the purposes of a bull pound and furthermore brought women of a bad character from Leicester who would when almost in a state of nudity rush out and run before the boys so that the parents were obliged to take their children away as the school became de moralized The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for 10,000 but inasmuch as in the declaration the pleader had only laid damages at 2,000 the verdict had to be reduced to that amount The judge however stated that had the damages been laid at 10,000 and the jury had found for that sum he would have endorsed their verdict Walton, R. (1873). Random Recollections of the Midland Circuit. United Kingdom: author at the Chiswick Press.

But I needed to know more. Especially about the bad charactered woman and her naked parade. So I found this:

 

LEICESTER AUG 17 Before the Lord Chief Baron Trimmer Clerk v Lord Hunt ingtower The Rev Henry Trimmer was the plaintiff and Lord Hunting tower the defendant The decla ration stated that the defendant had committed several nuisances to the great injury of the plaintiff to which the defendant pleaded that he was not guilty Mr Denman opened the plain tiff's case and then adduced evi dence of the following facts The plaintiff the grandson of a lady of some celebrity in the lite rary world resided previously to the year 1823 at Newdigate in Surrey where he had a curacy and was the proprietor of a respect able school In the course of that he was presented by the duke of Devonshire to the living of in Leicestershire and shortly afterwards took possession of the vicarage house which is near the paling of the defendant's demesne As soon as lord Hunt ingtower heard of his arrival he drove to the vicarage house in his carriage and had an interview with a brother of the plaintiffs His lordship stated that the duke of Devonshire had recently exchanged the right of presentation to this with him for another ad vowson and therefore proposed that the plaintiff should also ex change his living for one the in come of which was 20l or 301 a year greater To this Mr Trimmer mer replied that he did not think his brother would agree to that proposal because the living men tioned by his lordship was he un derstood situated in an aguish part of the country His lordship then proposed taking a lease of the glebe land and of some small tithes Mr Trimmer told him he would submit his proposal to his brother's consideration On the next day or the next day but one lord Huntingtower again drove to the vicarage when Mr Trimmer told him that the plaintiff declined to let the land or tithes as he meant to reside at the vicarage His lordship observed that the vicarage house was too large for a man of his income and would consequently ruin him if he resided in it Mr Trimmer replied that perhaps his brother might obtain leave to let the house to some gentleman for the sporting season whilst he re sided in a small one himself No said his lordship no gentleman willlive near me Or perhaps added Mr Trimmer my brother may increase the number of his pupils and bring them here to re side He shall bring no pupils here observed his lordship and added that he should take measures to prevent him Mr Trimmer said his lordship would of course do what he pleased but if he acted illegally his brother would cer tainly seek redress To which his lordship replied there was nothing he should like better than to engage him in a law suit He had already beaten the corporation of Grantham and afterwards the duke of Rut land at law and it was therefore not very likely that the plaintiff could stand against him for he would willingly spend 10,000 l upon a law suit with him There the matter rested and the plaintiff went back to Surrey In the month of September in the last year he came down to Buckmin ster to reside permanently and was accompanied by two pupils Mr Brown a young gentleman from Ireland and Mr Dalton In twoor three days after their arrival the young men were amusing them selves by firing with a small pistol at a target in the plaintiff's field through which there ran a public pathway The defendant drove in his carriage as far as his steward's house which was about one hun dred yards distant and sent his ser vant to desire the young men to de sist from firing Mr Brown replied that they were on Mr Trimmer's land and they would do as they pleased His lordship then drove up to the house and called out to Mr Trimmer I ll have no shoot ing here from those d d boys upon hearing which Mr Brown replied D d boys You scoun drel Lord Huntingtower then observed You ll see what I shall do to morrow and drove away On the following day his lord ship's workmen commenced erect ing a pinfold in a field immediately in front of the plaintiff's house at the distance of about thirty feet from it As soon as three sides of this pound were built a bull was turned into it which was only shut in on the fourth side by the paling of Mr Trimmer's lawn or foreground To this animal cows were brought daily generally about the hour of three o clock in the afternoon A male ass was also put in and she asses were led to it even on Sundays about the time when the afternoon service was over For some days after the last mentioned conversation had taken place Mr Trimmer and his two pupils continued to amuse
themselves firing at the target Mr Dalton occasionally using his gun instead of a pistol but the firing was discontinued on the 12th of November after which day none took place at least with Mr Trim mer's knowledge In the mean time various modes of annoyance were resorted to by the defendant He drove almost every day in his carriage to the front of plaintiff's house and stopped there for a quarter or half an hour either giving directions for what was going on or threatening to add to the stock of nuisances He had a sign erected in front of the pound on which was painted Trimmer's shooting academy There was a cottage contiguous to it to which he also had a sign affixed with the words I spy Trimmer's shooting academy In this cot tage a woman named Sally Hand resided with her husband and her sister a common girl from Stamford came there also about this time One day the defendant called the woman out of this house and then addressing Mr Brown who was about 18 years of age told him that she had got a girl for him who would invite him to drink tea and sleep with her Mr Trim mer immediately came forward and asked his lordship how he dared to address such language as that to his pupil The defendant denied having addressed it to the pupil saying he had merely spoken to the woman Hand Another pupil however declared he had heard him address the words to Mr Brown The defendant then drove home and returned in about an hour and a half upon which the plaintiff together with his pupils and servant treated him to a con cert of rough music Mr Trim mer performing on a poker and fireshovel another of the party rattling an old kettle with stones in it whilst the third extracted sweet sounds from the tongs This was stated to have been done for the purpose of preventing the defendant from being heard in case he made a fresh attempt to corrupt the pupils and also of driving him away All this time the disgust ing exhibitions at the pinfold conti nued without abatement in the immediate view of the plaintiff's family consisting of his wife and two children a boy and girl and three pupils a Mr Langdon of Cadogan place Sloane street having been added to their num ber in February The defendant allowed a she ass to remain with the male for some days and then separated them in order that they might make the more noise braying for each other He ordered his steward to put a mule into the pound as it would make more noise than the ass and being in formed that a horse would make more noise than either he threaten ed to add that to the stock Young Brown in some time afterwards said to him Well my lord you have not put in the horse to which his lordship answered that he would do so to morrow and he kept his word This was after the 12th of November when the firing which was the alleged provocation had been discontinued Mares were then brought to the horse and the nuisance rendered as dis gusting as possible Sometimes the mares were kept outside in order that the horse might make the louder noise All the time however his lordship was not alto gether free from having divers petty annoyances retorted on him self When his carriage made its appearance near the plaintiff's house his brother would approach it and jumping up look in at him by way of insulting him whilst the plaintiff himself would ride round it for the same purpose The pupils too were not back ward in manifesting the absence of much respect for him His mode of addressing his coachman Drive on Tommy was mi micked and he was told to go home for he was an old wretch Prior to the 12th of November Brown sometimes would fire off a pistol only charged with powder within twenty yards of his horses his lordship who is paralytic being unable to quit the carriage The horses however were never frightened by the report Whilst firing at the target the young men used to stand within forty or fifty yards of his lordship's paling but they always fired in a different di rection Upon one occasion the defendant told Brown that the plaintiff was a brick maker's son from Brentford to which Brown re plied I don t know who his father may be but I know that his grand mother was one of the cleverest women this country ever produced D n his grandmother said his lordship who the devil cares about her At length the de fendant informed Brown that he meant to advertise his name and that of Langdon's together with the plaintiff's in the Leicester and Lincoln newspapers and here again his lordship was as good as his word for on the following Friday the advertisement appear ed It was addressed To But chers who are free of the town of Grantham It then stated that there was a butcher's shop to let in the town of Grantham and re ferred for particulars to his lord ship's steward who resided at Buckminster where the rev Henry Trimmer and his pupils Brown and Langdon amused themselves daily by shooting at a target with guns and pistols in the most fre quented thoroughfare in the parish to the great danger and annoyance of all their neighbours who had occasion to pass that way Ano ther advertisement subsequently appeared commencing as before but adding that some poor Irish labourers had been set upon and one of them shot by ten ruffians for merely saying that a Roman Catholic priest would not have acted as this parson of the Church of England had done Some of them however it went on to state had been lodged in gaol and the others were known so that there were hopes that they would all be transported at the next Leicester sessions for their ruffianly conduct Young Langdon having gone home for the holidays a letter addressed to his mother was delivered by the defendant's servant to the village postmaster and was received by Mrs Langdon after her son had engaged his place in the coach to return to the plaintiff This letter which was in a disguised hand was couched in the grossest language acquainting Mrs Langdon that her son in company with the plaintiff shot at a target witnessed the scenes at the pinfold had had a criminal intercourse with a girl named Sally Hand who was preg nant by him and lastly had shot an Irishman for which he was likely to be tried Mrs Langdon wrote to the plaintiff on the sub ject informing him that she did not believe one tittle of the impu tations attempted to be cast upon him or her son but adding her ex treme regret that from the dread of having his name associated with
home to his friends in Ireland and did not afterwards return until now when he came as a witness for the plaintiff such charges however false she durst not allow her son to return to Mr Trimmer's house The boy therefore for whose instruc tion Mr Trimmer was receiving 150 guineas per annum was kept away A letter in a similar hand was received by the bishop of Lin coln to whom the defendant stated to Brown first that he would write and afterwards that he had written The bishop transmitted it under cover to the plaintiff It was signed A Farmer and in coarse terms described the plaintiff as a disgrace to his sacred profession One day in the present year while the plaintiff was from home Mr Brown in company with Dalton went into the fields with a gun in his hand Some person having started a hare the animal passed him by and unable to resist the temptation he fired and shot it Lord Huntingtower's steward laid informations against the two young men who were convicted in the penalty of 25l which sum Mr Trimmer immediately paid for them Mr Brown then went An objection was taken on the part of the defendant to the admis sion of the above letters in evidence as not having been sufficiently brought home to his lordship as the writer of them The lord chief baron having taken a note of the objection told the jury they were to pay no attention to them if they were not satisfied they had been written by the defendant but if they thought that they had then they would take them into consi deration The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the full sum laid in the declaration namely 2,000 l damages The Annual Register, Or, A View of the History, Politics, and Literature for the Year …. (1830). United Kingdom: J. Dodsley.

I have subsequently done a bunch more research about Lord Huntingtower, because I wanted to better understand the character of a man who would do something so nutty. Neighbor disputes happen frequently, even leading up to violence, but this seemed over the limit for a man whose obituary would speak of him as a great, if peculiar gentleman:

LORD HUNTINGTOWER. His Lordship was the oldest heir-apparent in the Peerage of Great Britain. He some years ago experienced a severe attack of paralysis, which, without impairing his mental faculties, deprived him of the use of his lower extremities. Since this period he led a life of seclusion, except as regarded the management and improvement of his large estates, to which he gave unremitting and constant attention. It was his daily practice to drive out in his carriage to witness the progress of the numerous workmen employed on the property surrounding Buckminster, with whom he usually continued several hours. On Thursday, the 7th instant, as he was returning to dinner, he was suddenly seized with apoplexy. An express was immediately dispatched to the nearest surgeon, Mr. Barber, of Coltersworth, and, subsequently, to Dr. Turner, of Grantham, Mr. Wing, of Knipton, and Dr. Arnold, of Leicester, who were prompt in giving their attendance, and rendering every exertion the case admitted. On Saturday Sir H. Halford reached Buckminster, and was joined in the medical consultation. All human aid, however, proved unavailing. The Noble Sufferer lingered till Monday, with occasional glimpses of consciousness, when death closed the scene of his earthly sufferings. 

Lord Huntingtower was the eldest son of John Manners, Esq. (eldest son of Lord William Manners, the son of John, second Duke of Rutland), and Louisa, present Countess of Dysart, who still survives, at a very advanced age, one of the most extraordinary women of the day. He was brother to the three celebrated beauties, Louisa, late Duchess of St. Alban’s; Lady Sophia Heathcote; and the Hon. Mrs. Duff, wife of the present Earl of Fife, the circumstances of whose death created so great a sensation in the fashionable world many years ago. He stood in the same degree of relationship to the Hon. John Tollemache, who became united in 1806 to Mary, Duchess of Roxburghe; to Charles Tollemache, Esq., married to the granddaughter of Luke Viscount Mountjoy, and to Lady Laura Tollemache, who formed an alliance with John Dalrymple, seventh Earl of Stair, which marriage was dissolved in 1809, in consequence of a previous contract in Scotland, on the part of the Earl, with Miss Gordon, which contract was set aside by the Lords of Session at Edinburgh in 1820. His Lordship whilst retaining the paternal name of Manners was created a Baronet on the 5th January, 1793. On his mother succeeding to the honours of her family at the decease of her brother, Wilbraham, Earl of Dysart, in 1821, he became Lord Huntingtower, and assumed, by Royal permission, the name of Tollemache only. His Lordship, in 1790, married Catherine Rebecca, daughter of Francis Grey, Esq., of Lehena, in the county of Cork, by whom he leaves a surviving family of six sons and five daughters. Mr. Algernon Tollemache, his youngest son, was lately elected Member of Parliament for Grantham. 

Lord Huntingtower’s death will be deeply regretted by a numerous body of servants and retainers. He was an indulgent and kind master ; and when we state that his princely income was chiefly spent in the immediate neighbourhood of his residence, and amongst the middle and lower classes of society, it may be imagined his loss is not regarded guarded in the light of an ordinary occurrence. To illustrate our opinion we shall only state one fact, viz., that in the severe winters of 1828 and 1829 he gave employment to not less than 528 labourers in the vicinity of Buckminster. 

Though occasionally exhibiting peculiar eccentricities of conduct Lord Huntingtower possessed singular tact in estimating the characters of all with whom he came in contact, joined to uncommon shrewdness and ability in the every-day concerns of life. His genealogical and heraldic knowledge was of an extraordinary and diffusive character, from the retentiveness of his memory and its constituting a favourite branch of his constant study.

His Lordship’s eldest son, the Hon. Lionel William John Manners Tollemache, succeeds to the title of Huntingtower, and to the very large paternal estates of the family. His Lordship also becomes next in succession to the Earldom of Dysart. He was born in 1794, and married Miss Toone, daughter of Colonel Toone, by whom he has one son, aged 13. The very ancient family of Tollemache claims Saxon descent, and the name is said to be a corruption of the Saxon word “tollmack,” tolling of the bell. The Tollemaches have flourished with the greatest honour in an uninterrupted male succession in the county of Suffolk since the first arrival of the Saxons in England, a period of more than thirteen centuries. Tollemache, Lord of Bentley, in Suffolk, and Stoke Tollemache, in the county of Oxford, lived in the sixth century ; and upon the old manor-house at Bentley (which the family occupied previous to the magnificent seat at Helmingham coming into their possession) may still be seen the following inscription : * Before the Normans into England came Bentley was my seat, and Tollemache was my name.” Morning Post – Monday 18 March 1833

The gentleman was involved, as he alluded to in his threats against Reverend Trimmer, in other litigation, seemingly related to disputes in Grantham about property lines:

BOUNDARIES OF GRANTHAM AND LORD HUNTINGTOWER. WiTnouT expressing an opinion whether we shall or shall not be disposed to support the Talmashes, or one of them, in preference to the rumoured intentions of such talentless opponents of reform as the Custs and the Welbys, we feel it right to state, that government, through Mr. Stanley, has given a strong opinion against Lord Huntingtower’s notion that the seven miles of boundary round Grantham is to be measured ¢ as the crow flies.” Mr. Stanley replies to this question in the following terms :—* I beg to acquaint you that I have consulted the crown counsel on the subject, according to whose opinion the distance is to be cofnputed by the nearest comvenmient road, and not by a straight line drawn from the borough to the place of residence.’Drakard’s Stamford News – Friday 19 October 1832

I found another case, Langdon v. Lord Huntingtower, where one of Trimmer’s pupils sued him for libellous remarks about unproven allegations about participation in a riot (Shrewsbury Chronicle – Friday 20 August 1830) where ultimately the pupil was awarded 1k.

Lord Huntingtower was the oldest child of the 7th Countess of Dysart, Louisa Manners.  I had  heard of Louisa Manners when researching and writing my book:

because she was fond of attending and throwing masquerade balls, like this one in July 1805:

Morning Post – Monday 22 July 1805

Louisa had a fascinating life story, herself:

At the death of the Duchess of Lauderdale her eldest son by Sir Lionel Tollemache succeeded to her title and to the Ham property The Tollemaches were an old Suffolk family of Saxon descent The name is supposed to signify a bell ringer In the reign of Henry VI Sir Lionel Tollemache having married an heiress who owned Helmingham in Suffolk made that place his seat His grandson obtained considerable grants of confiscated church lands from Henry VIII including the manor and rectory of Wandsen the manor and rectory of Le Church Hey and the manors of Bury Hall Willows and Overhall A succeeding Sir Lionel who was High Sheriff of Norfolk and Suffolk entertained Queen Elizabeth at Helming ham in one of her progresses His son was subsequently created a Baronet by James I It was the third Baronet nearly all of them were Sir Lionels who married the Countess Dysart who was afterwards Duchess of Lauderdale The third Earl had fifteen children and yet by a strange fatality in the next generation for want of a male heir the Peerage passed to one of his daughters and her issue Of his five sons who grew up to manhood two inherited the Earldom but died without children a third was killed by a fall from a masthead a fourth lost his life in a duel and the fifth perished in a shipwreck The title then passed to a daughter of the third Earl She
was married to Mr John Manners of Grantham Grange John Manners was the bastard son of Lord William Manners whose father the Duke of Rutland seems to have provided for him more liberally than is the wont of Peers in dealing with their younger sons I have already described how much of the wealth of the Manners family is due to the confiscation of Church lands so it is unnecessary to travel over the same ground Lord William appears to have increased his posses sions by purchases and at his death his property went to his natural son John who assumed the name of Manners The Countess brought the title John Manners the land and now the Earl of Dysart boasts of 8,420 acres in Leicester and 18,025 in Lincoln Lord Huntingtower the eldest son of the Countess died in the lifetime of his mother but the extraordinary election transactions in which he was engaged deserve to be placed upon record I forbear from expressing any opinion upon his conduct preferring rather to leave the facts in all their naked hideousness Lord Huntingtower had purchased a number of small houses in the little town of Ilchester in Somerset which at that time returned two members to the House of Commons Obviously the property was bought for electioneering purposes and most abominably was his lordship's object carried out It soon became a desperate struggle between bribery and intimidation and bad as is the man who bribes he is pure as snow compared with the man who intimidates In the year 1802 most of the voters were bribed with 30 each and so Lord Huntingtower's candi dates were defeated In order to prevent a similar accident in future this considerate landlord actually pulled down 240 houses and built a large workhouse for the reception of the electors He then let the workhouse to the parish the inmates thus being disqualified from voting though not receiving parish relief There these poor people lived till 1818 but the remaining electors proving equally obstinate and returning two members once more in opposition to his wish Lord Huntingtower in revenge turned more than 160 of the inhabitants of his workhouse into the highways in the depth of winter Old men infants in arms and women on the point of lying in were thus rendered homeless and for the remainder of the winter had to camp out by the roadside with nothing to shelter them but a few hurdles covered with straw
At the next election the majority of the few remaining electors again polled against Lord Huntingtower's two relatives The rector leased his glebe to one of the successful candidates who built houses thereon and the Corporation let some borough land on a lease of four lives for a similar purpose Thus the power of the Tollemaches was effectually broken Comment is needless But it is surprising that in the ranks of the working classes are found some who can be induced to vote for the political heirs of such tyrants as Lord Hunting tower The late Earl of Dysart whose death has been very recently reported was a person whose eccentricity bordered upon madness In reference to the unusual Evans, H. (1879). Our Old Nobility. By Noblesse Oblige [pseud.].. United Kingdom: Political Tract Society.

There, in the recollections of Mr. Evans is the suggestion that the family wealth had a lot to do with confiscating Church lands. I suspect his battle with Reverend Trimmer had something to do with family history.

Louisa eloped with John Manners, a bastard, in 1765 via Scotland after throwing the key to the garden door over the wall so she could not return. Her father patched up the scandal by insisting a follow up wedding at St. James. Manners was fifteen years Louisa’s senior, and was MP for Neward in Nottinghamshire at the time. Mr. Manners would eventually inherit Hanby Hall and Buckmister from his father, where Lord Huntingtower would subsequently terrorize schoolchildren.

William Tollemache, Lord Huntingtower’s own son would continue the scandal, going into bankruptcy. He was eventually a Tory politician, and would succeed his grandmother into the earldom, becoming the 8th Earl of Dysart.

Such an interesting rabbit hole to fall into, with drama, lawsuits, nude women and libellous advertisements, an anvil marriage, and bankruptcy.


Discover more from Regency Reader

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Regency Villains: Lord Huntingtower

  1. impossiblyvoid1664e1561c says:

    This is wild! What great research and commentary on your part as always. Keep up the great work and digging for us.

    • Anne says:

      Aw, thank you for your kind words. I had to share these wild twists and turns with someone who would appreciate it. So glad you did!