A reader on social media asks: What were the Regency equivalent of checks?
I appreciated the question so much, I thought I would share the answer here with a little more detail.
So by the early 19th century, there were three types of legitimate paper money and one that was more a debt of honour.
The debt of honour was an IOU, sometimes referred to as a vowel (IOU…get it?)
Grose, F. (1796). A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue. By Francis Grose. United Kingdom: Hooper & Company.
An IOU acknowledges a debt exists, but does not contain specific terms or conditions and was generally thought more of a debt of honour than a promissory note that was legally binding.
By the long Regency, there were essentially two forms of promissory note: promissory note and banknote. Banknotes are promissory notes issued by a bank and payable to the bearer on demand, and could be reissued. By the late 1780s, the Bank of England began issuing £1 and £2 notes, adding £5 by 1825. Banknotes issued by private banks all looked different, some carrying pictures of the town the bank was based out of, or a coat of arms, or animal. This resulted in issues with fraud and forgery despite heavy penalities including capital punishment, so that by 1808 a license was required to issue a note. 755 licenses were issued throughout England and Wales (Banknotes). One suggestion in the newspaper was to print a warning on banknotes:
New Times (London) – Thursday 26 February 1818
Before the more formal printing of banknotes in select denominations, they were printed sort of like blank checks where details were filled in: 
This image came of the Bank of England website that has a whole timeline of the evolution of banknotes here: Early banknotes | Bank of England
Promissory notes tended to be more like the early version of a banknote where the holder could fill out the details, but often it was a promise of payment so that terms like due date or interest would be added in:

Goodacre, R. (1811). A Treatise on Book-keeping, Adapted to the Use of Schools: Containing Two Sets of Books by Single Entry, One by Double Entry, and an Outlineset to be Filled Up by Either Method : to which is Added, a Familiar Dissertation on the Various Bills and Notes, Used in Commerce as Substitutes for Cash. United Kingdom: Cradock and Joy.
For many large bills, including foreign transactions, what was more common were bills of exchange. From my understanding, these are most like the modern check.
Goodacre, R. (1811). A Treatise on Book-keeping, Adapted to the Use of Schools: Containing Two Sets of Books by Single Entry, One by Double Entry, and an Outlineset to be Filled Up by Either Method : to which is Added, a Familiar Dissertation on the Various Bills and Notes, Used in Commerce as Substitutes for Cash. United Kingdom: Cradock and Joy.
I know Georgette Heyer, a time or two, refers to paper money as “rolls of soft” but I have not yet found any evidence that is anything other than a Heyerism. A clever one, but not one I have been able to validate as cant in actual use.
In a lot of ways, what was evolving with paper money was a system still familiar to some, at least older generations, today. Credit, checks, and ready money (cash) ruled the day with distinctions between credit (debt), checks, and cash.
Discover more from Regency Reader
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.









